DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20852
Refer to: OCPS
INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE CIRCULAR NO. 1996-08
Effective Date: 10/25/1996
AGENCY-WIDE REDEPLOYMENT PROGRAM
| Sec. | |
|---|---|
|
1. |
Purpose |
| 2. |
Background |
| 3. |
Policy |
| 4. |
Authorities |
| 5. |
Procedures |
| 6. | Applicable Personnel
Policies and Procedures |
| 7. | Appeals |
| 8. | Effective Date |
| 1. |
Purpose. The purpose of the Agency-Wide Redeployment Program (AWRP) is to establish a framework and process for the redeployment of Indian Health Service (IHS) employees from one IHS location to another (i.e., Area to Area; Headquarters-to-Area; Headquarters-to-Headquarters, etc.). Intra-Area or intra-Headquarters redeployment actions are within the authorities of the respective IHS Area Director (AD) or IHS Director of Headquarters Operations (DHO). Redeployment in this circular is defined as the directed reassignment or transfer of IHS employees (Civil Service or Commissioned Corps) from their current position and geographic location to another position and location, for which they are qualified and at the same or lower grade.
|
| 2. |
Background. The IHS is undergoing significant changes that are expected to continue well into the foreseeable future. The change elements include but are not limited to: deficit reduction and budget controls resulting in the need for more efficient utilization of all resources; restructuring and streamlining initiatives; reinvention of government; and tribal self-government. These elements require the IHS to establish a formal process to effectively and efficiently
redeploy its personnel from one location to another while preserving the rights of the employees and furthering the mission of the IHS. Today, as American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) tribes assume greater responsibility and control over IHS health programs that serve the health care needs of their respective communities, the role of the IHS has changed. The IHS will adapt to this new environment by changing the size and composition of its workforce, while remaining committed to maintain its support and provision of health services to the tribes that have decided to continue receiving health care services from the IHS. Because this process of Indian self-determination has not occurred in a uniform manner across the Indian health care delivery program, the IHS has determined that it has become necessary to redeploy personnel not just within specific IHS Areas, but to other Areas that demonstrate a need to fill fundable vacancies. The redeployment of IHS personnel has previously been informal, relying primarily on voluntary cooperation and special arrangements between all the individuals involved. Reluctance or any indication of objection by a receiving Area or the affected personnel was sufficient to void the reassignment or transfer. The IHS has reached a point in its organizational life that voluntarism is insufficient, ineffective, and not meeting the emerging challenges and forces facing the agency. The IHS has implemented a major restructuring effort through the Indian Health Design Team (IHDT) that is charged to design a new IHS organization that will continue to be responsive to the health care needs of the AI/AN people, whether the Indian health program is carried out by tribal health programs,. Urban Indian health programs, or the IHS direct health care service programs.
The IHS Council of Area and Associate Directors, at its August 1995 meeting, affirmed the findings and recommendations of the IHDT to develop a centrally managed AWRP to better meet the management needs of the IHS. |
| 3. |
Policy. The IHS AWRP will be guided by the IHS mission and goal statements, the Director's vision statement, and the IHDT findings and recommendations. All employees will be treated fairly. Decisions will be based on the needs of the IHS and, whenever possible and practicable, the desires of individual employees. A reduction-in-force (RIF) of civil
service employees will be used only after all redeployment options have been exhausted. A reduction-in-strength/(RIS) of commissioned officers will be applied only at the discretion of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, as directed in Commissioned Corps Personnel Manual (CCPM) Chapter 23, Subchapter CC23.7, Personnel Instruction 3, "Reduction in Strength Within the PHS Commissioned Corps Due to Program Reductions." Absent a formal RIS by the Secretary, Commissioned Officers for whom suitable reassignments cannot be found under this policy will be managed in accordance with CCPM 23.7, Personnel Instruction 1 ('Involuntary Separation During Probationary Period Served by Officers on Active Duty in the Reserve Corps) or CCPM 43.7, Personnel Instruction 1 (Separation of Officers in the Regular and Reserve Corps Without Consent of the Officers Involved). All AWRP actions will be managed by the Director of field operations (DFO) and the AWRP Review Board. The AWRP Review Board is comprised of four members, including a chair, nominated by the DFO and approved by the Director, IHS. The membership is drawn from Headquarters as follows:
All AWRP actions will be carried out in conjunction with the IHS Merit Promotion Plan; IHS Circular No. 87-2, Indian Preference; applicable provisions of Public Law (P.L.) 960 135, the Indian Civil Service Retirement Act, and other applicable personnel administration laws and policies (Civil Service and/or Commissioned Corps), applicable to the transfer or reassignment of Federal employees. With the exception of consideration given to Indian preference candidates, Areas and/or Headquarters will extend preference in filling vacancies to individuals being relocated under this policy.
|
| 4. |
Authorities and Responsibilities. The
following authorities
are delegated responsibilities cited for the effective operation of the AWRP:
|
| A. |
|
| B. |
|
| C. |
|
| D. |
|
| 5. |
Procedure. Each IHS Area and Headquarters office is an integral part of the AWRP and must adhere to the processes described herein as supporting the mission of the IHS in providing the best possible health care to the AI/AN people it serves.
|
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| C. |
|
| 6. |
APPLICABLE PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Specific authorities and procedures necessary to effectively carry out actions to redeploy personnel (Civil Service and Commissioned Corps) are within current delegations to the Director, IHS, which are redelegated to the ADS and the DHO.
The basic authority for reassigning civil service personnel is contained in 5 U.S.C. 7106, 'Management's right to reassign employees." The basic authority for reassigning commissioned corps personnel is contained in 42 CFR 21.33. While this circular addresses Agency-wide relocation of personnel, the implementation of the AWRP is subject to local collective bargaining unit negotiations. Elements within the scope of negotiation are:. the determination of the number of employees, occupational grades and series, and the changes in the working conditions affected by redeployment.
Actions carried out under this circular will adhere to the policies and procedures contained in the IHS Merit Promotion Plan; IH Circular No. 87-2, Indian Preference; the applicable provisions of P.L. 96-135, the Indian Civil Service Retirement Act; the IHS Career Transition Assistance Program; and, all other laws and policies applicable to reassignment and/or transfers of Federal employees. |
| 7. |
Appeals. |
| A. |
|
| B. |
|
| C. |
|
| 8. | Effective Date. This circular is effective upon the date of signature by the Director, IHS. |
