DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Rockville, Maryland 20852
Refer to: OD
INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE CIRCULAR NO. 2002-02
Effective Date: 08/09/2002
CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLANNING PROGRAM
Circular Exhibit 2002-02-A, "Continuity of Operations Plan: Impact Analysis"
| 1. | PURPOSE: The purpose of this Circular is to
establish policies, procedures, and operational requirements for the
implementation , management, and administration of the Indian Health
Service (IHS) Continuity of Operations (COOP) planning program. This
Circular assigns COOP responsibilities to all levels of IHS management.
All IHS-wide COOP planning and coordination activities of the regular
functions of IHS senior management officials and their organizations
throughout the IHS. |
| 2. | OBJECTIVE: The principal objective of the
COOP: |
| A. |
|
| B. |
|
| C. |
|
| 3. | SCOPE: |
| A. |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
A national emergency such as a war involving the United States (U.S.) Armed Forces, an attack on the U.S., or any threat to the continuity of the Federal Government. |
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| C. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| 4. | POLICY.
The IHS shall have in place a viable COOP plan, with the capability to ensure
the performance of essential functions during any emergency or situation
that may disrupt normal operations, as a baseline of preparedness for the full range of
potential emergencies. All IHS senior management officials will have sufficient capabilities to meet essential needs during a national emergency, including the capability to respond to the needs of individuals and state or local governments where required by law or binding policy. |
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| B. |
|
| 5. |
BACKGROUND. All COOP planning is simply a good business practice that is a part of the fundamental mission of agencies as responsible and reliable public institutions. For years, COOP planning had been an individual agency responsibility primarily in response to emergencies within the confines of the organization. The content and structure of COOP plans, operational standards, and inter-agency coordination, if any, were left to the discretion of the agency. The changing threat environment and recent emergencies, including localized acts of nature, accidents, technological emergencies, and military or terrorist attack-related incidents, have shifted awareness to the need for COOP capabilities that enable agencies to continue their essential functions across a broad spectrum of emergencies. Also, the potential for terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction has emphasized the need to provide the President a capability, which ensures continuity of essential government functions across the Federal Executive Branch. To provide a focal point to orchestrate this expanded effort, Presidential Decision Directive-67, Continuity of Operations Planning, dated October 21, 1998, established the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as the Executive Agent for Federal Executive Branch COOP. Inherent in that role is the responsibility to formulate guidance for agencies to use in developing viable, executable COOP plans; facilitate interagency Coordination as appropriate; and oversee and assess the status of COOP capability across the Federal Executive Branch. Additionally, each agency is responsible for appointing a senior Federal government executive as an “Emergency Coordinator” to serve as program manager and agency point of contact for coordinating agency COOP activities.
|
| 6. | PLAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE |
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| C. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| D. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| E. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| (6) |
|
| F. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| G. |
|
| H.. |
|
| I. |
|
| J. |
|
| 7. | VITAL RECORDS PROGRAM.
|
| A. |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| 8. |
CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. All COOP plans must take into consideration the handling and management of classified information. Classified national security information is marked as Top Secret, Secret, or Confidential. The President appoints the original classifier. The IHS does not have classification authority.
|
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| 9. |
| A. |
|
| B. |
|
| C. |
|
| D. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| E. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| (6) |
|
| (7) |
|
| (8) |
|
| F. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| a. |
This responsibility requires that they have direct access to their respective office directors. |
| b. |
In developing plans or communicating emergency messages pertaining to National Security COOP, COOP planners are to interact directly with the Director, IHS, and/or any element delegated by the Director, IHS. |
| c. |
Will inform the Director, IHS, of any emergency situations originating at the field level and provide appropriate status reports to ensure intra-agency and inter-agency coordination. |
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| (6) |
|
| (7) |
|
| (8) |
|
| (9) |
|
| (10) |
|
| (11) |
|
| G. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| (6) |
|
| (7) |
|
| (8) |
|
| H. |
|
| I. |
|
| J. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
Develops plans and procedures to coordinate with Agency offices in developing and supporting requirements for National Security COOP Telecommunications. |
| (3) |
In collaboration with the IHS RMO, develops IHS-wide policies and procedures for the protection and storage of vital electronic records for computer systems maintained by the IHS. |
| (4) |
Coordinates with IHS senior management officials and other key officials in the development of their contingency plans for the retrieval of electronic records during or after emergency situations. |
| (5) |
Cooperates with HHS, General Services Administration, Department of Defense, and communications common carriers in the management and operation of elements of the National Communications System available to IHS under emergency conditions. |
| (6) |
Establishes policies and procedures reflecting the minimum information security requirements or critical/mission-essential Automated Information System's infrastructure in the IHS. |
| K. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| 10. |
VITAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM |
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) |
|
| (6) |
|
| C. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| D. |
|
| E. |
|
| F. |
|
| 11. |
SUCCESSION OF
IHS OFFICIALS IN AN EMERGENCY |
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| B. |
|
| C. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| D. |
|
| 12. |
EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS.
|
| A. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| B. |
|
| (1) |
|
| a. |
|
| b. |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| C. |
Alert, Assembly, and Relocation. In a “With Warning” or a Without Warning During Normal Duty Hours condition, the following procedures will be followed: |
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| (4) |
|
| D. |
|
| E. |
|
| (1) |
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
|
| 13. |
SUPERSEDURE. None. |
| 14. |
EFFECTIVE DATE. This Circular is effective upon date of signature. |
Acting Director, Indian Health Service